Nature vs nurture Essay

at that place has always been a speculative debate on nature verses procreation. It is a debate that is still button on today. Many psychologist and other professions still filtering make an agreement for unrivalled or the other. I believe that is it twain nature and affirm because it cannot be just one overpowering the other. I believe that both nature and nurture intertwine with one another for e very tender since birth. Psychologists such as Erickson believed that nature determines the sequence of the stages and it sets the limits within which nurture operates. merely is this really true? To me it felt that Erickson believed it intertwined some but he was to a greater extent on the nature side more. I dont regard nature determines it mainly because nurture could do the same thing. It depends on the situation. whiz of the psychologists that I agree with the most is Vygotsky. Vygotsky is a developmental psychologist. Most developmental psychologist believe that nature and nurture combine to influence development, biological means bunco a stronger office in some aspects of development, such as physical development, and environmental factors playing a stronger role in others, such as moral development. His theories be theories that seem to be more relat equal to(p) and comprehendible than the other psychologist who be leaning more to nature or more to nurture. Vygotsky views on cognitive development was Intellectual development can lonesome(prenominal) be understood in terms of a childs historical and cultural context. Also, Development depends on the sign arrangements that individuals have forthcoming to them. Vygotsky assumed that adults could convey children by means of conversations how their culture interpret and respond to the world. He believed that every culture has transmitted physical and cognitive tools that are utilise in daily lives. He believed that thoughts and languages become more interdependent in the first five years of a childs life. There are complex mental processes that begin as a favorable activity and child are able to transform the processes that they use in a social activity in their feature internalization of activity. He believed that children can perform more challenging activities when they have someone thither to help them who are more competent (Ormrod,2008). Around the same sequence Vygotsky was doing this making his own theories, there was another man who was from Russia as intimately named, Piaget, who had his own ideas. Piaget and Vygotsky were similar in some ways but they likewise had some differences. Piaget assumed that children are active and motivated learners. He hearts that children are curious abouttheir surroundings. He assumed that children construct knowledge through experience. He believed that they gained this by the physical and social environment, which is critical for cognitive growth. Piaget had his own stages of cognitive development. The first one is sensorimotor, which occurs from birth until the toddler is two years of age. Sensorimotor is when they start forming object permanence and they have progress from involuntary to goal-oriented behavior. Second, the preoperational stage which is from age two to seven years old. This is when they develop the office to use symbol to represent an object. Third, is concrete operational from ages seven to 11 years of age. They are thinking more logically in this stage. They are less egocentric. Lastly, it is formal operation which starts at eleven and goes to adulthood. They are able to think abstract and can solve problems through a system of experimenting (Ormrod, 2008). I believe what Piaget and Vygotsky had implanted because when I am talking to petty(a) kids, it is easier to talk to them to see how they see things. Having that open communication as an adult, I get a feeling on where they are coming from and try to go from there. They are things that the environment cannot teach a child. I feel there are things that are already innate in them charm they were in the womb and after they came out. It is very hard to choose that one conquers the other because they play out equally. Weather it is nature or nurture, it is very important when it comes to human development. It is very clear that they play a extensive role in everyday life and it will continue to play a role until the day that we pass away. I am a firm believer that both nature and nurture plays a role in life. Everything that Piaget and Vygotsky said is very true. Even other psychologists that are more on the nature side or more on the nurture side, they all bring valid points.ReferencesOrmrod, J. E. (2008). Educational Psychology Developing Learners, 6th. hurrying Saddle, NJPearson. Merrill, Prentice-Hall.Slavin, R. (2003). Educational Psychology Theory and Practice and Practice, 7th.Boston, MA Allyn and Bacon.Miller, P. (1983). Theories of developmental Psychology. San Francisco W.H.Freeman and Company. Santrock, J.(1996). Child Development. Dubuque, IA Brown and Benchmark Publishers.