Compare the short story "Flowers for Algernon" with the movie, bringing out carefully the differences between the two and including your evaluation of which medium is the more successful.

The deflexions between Flowers for Algernon as a minuscule story and as a photograph found the differences between the two media. In my essay I am going to show, from the differences between the soon story and the word picture, the differences between the two media, coming up with the finish that the goldbrick story is the better medium by which to recognize this story. One of the most significant differences between the myopic story and the picture show is the give awaying of Charlies flake in the story. In the book for example, is cryptograph said somewhat his family, whereas in the celluloid is told a swarm approximately his childhood and in the end he likewise sees his mother. When we see Charlie in the motion-picture show identifying himself as l mavinly, he becomes a much described character than he is in the book. This shows the difference that in a short story we prepare to develop a character ourselves, tho in a movie only throughout one picture of a psyche we already get a description of this character we would neer have got in a short story. In the movie we have seen the data about Charlie we immediately get it back up by information about his family. There are in like sort varied kinds of pathos in short story and movie. With the appellative of Charlie Ms Kinnian and indirectly Algernon with the loneliness in the movie, they identify themselves as sad. This makes the movie much more pathetic than the short story, because in the short story only the identifying between Charlie and Algernon takes place, which is much slight pathetic. What overly support the pathos in the movie is the all in all emotion around the relationship between Charlie and Ms Kinnian. This could represent the situation that a movie has to be more emotional... give thanks you for an interesting watchword of the book and movie versions of Flowers for Algernon. Charlie is one of the more tragic ! figures in literature. What happens to him underscores the truth of that old saying about being scrupulous what you wish for. It is ironic that the operation that was boffo in make him a smarter person, at least for a little while, also made him incapable of happiness by transforming him into someone who became resentful, self-centered and contemptuous of others. We should take to heart the wide-eyed but strong message to be content with what we have if we wish to be happy. If you want to get a amply essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper